1) Using your text and the internet, in narrative format with a minimum of 500 words, outline the case of Watson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, (1986) Give the facts, issue, and court holding of the case.
2) In detail, discuss challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. Detail the differences, when they are appropriate to use, when they are not appropriate, and the similarities and differences of each. Cite cases to support your findings.
3) If you were hired by a defense attorney as a jury consultant, list some factors or recommendations you would make in order to try to get the “most” impartial jury panel possible. Give your reasoning for your recommendations.
ANSWER QUESTIONS BY THE NUMBERS AND SITE YOUR WORD.